I like these pages especially:
I think the link between all these is that they are surprising, unexpected, more than they seemed to be at first. I like the world to be surprising. I like twists. I like something that's not obvious, that's counter-intuitive. I like irregularity. I like depths, especially hidden depths.
One of the reasons I dread a liberal, progressive, over-tolerant society is because it's so dull, flat and rational. Sometimes I think the tendency of political correctness towards absurdity and contradiction is actually its saving grace.
In other news, I have a letter in today's Irish Times taking issue with Una Mulally, the Queen of Irish political correctness.
Funnily enough, Mullally says something in the article to which I'm responding with which I can sympathise, given the feelings I've just expressed:
Irish media is obsessed with contrarianism and loudmouths. It is obsessed even more with the contrarian voices who are generally merely out to seek attention (the gay man opposed to marriage equality, the woman who thinks contemporary feminism is damaging, the “right on” person who wants to police the tone of rights campaigners, the “liberal” guy who thinks there’s a conspiracy of “groupthink” or “consensus”). It’s all so basic. It’s all so intellectually underdeveloped, populated by people who don’t realise that these arguments have been hashed out so many times before, and have the arrogance or just self-propelling cynicism to think that their hot take is unique. We’ve heard it all before.
Can such contrarianism possibly be as "basic" as the arguments of the progressive left, or even the progressive right? Or the societies based on such arguments? I like traditionalist conservatism the best because its arguments are the least obvious. I also think they show the most insight into reality. The human soul is not boring and society is not boring unless we artificially flatten out all its irregularities and quirks.
In other news, I've become quite depressed about ad hominem attacks. Not attacks aimed at me particularly, but at people who hold this or that of my opinions. I am the specialest snowflake of them all, so I am easily pained by such things. I don't mind being branded a reactionary, fascist, bigot, etc. etc. but I do bruise when someone suggests: "People like you have these beliefs because you are inadequate in this or that way." For example: you are a nostalgist because you can't deal with anything new. (That's just an example.) I got a lot of this on Facebook, and it really gets to me.
It was the 16th before I read this... Sts Joachim (62 missal) and Stephen of Hungary (ordinary form). It's usually confusing juxtaposing the two calendars but it's unusual to get two outstanding married men at once.
ReplyDeleteCongratulations on getting your letter in and many blessings from these two Saints on all you do Maolsheachlann!
St Stephen of Hungary (where they celebrate their national day today, the 20th, when I first read this) are perhaps about as political incorrect as a saint may be, judged and sentenced by modernist sages after his departure, being KING and ARMED and All That comes with it. I trust you are in good company though. Hope you keep up the good blog writings!
ReplyDeleteThanks! I had to re-red this blog post to remember what it was about, ha ha ha ha!
DeleteI like that you draw the sword for conservatism in its basic forms even when it ain´t always news, not just this article. Probably much different to be a freedom fighter for ideas (political incorrect) in St Stephen´s day than in our.
ReplyDelete