Sunday, December 9, 2018

Self-Doubt

On this blog, I always imagine myself writing to a friendly and sympathetic audience. Sadly, in the past, I have had the experience of one of my more introspective and self-questioning posts being rather unchivalrously used in another context. So I ask anyone of this tendency to either stop reading now, or to refrain from taking advantage of my candour here in an ungallant way.

I haven't blogged for a while, and I've been absent from other online spaces. Some readers were kind enough to contact me and ask if I was OK-- which I greatly appreciate. I did not respond to everybody, for which I apologise. 

I have been suffering from a lot of self-doubt, in a way that I'll try to explain.

I have a very contrasting attitude towards my beliefs on the one hand, and my own holding of those beliefs on the other. When it comes to my beliefs, I am quite willing (even eager) to take on the world. I've never had the slightest difficulty in going against the stream, arguing with everyone in the room, or being mocked and ridiculed for my convictions.

When it comes to myself, however, I am extremely prone to self-doubt. I have spectacularly low self-esteem and I am willing to believe any criticism made of me, directly or indirectly-- or even criticisms that originate in my own head. I don't only take them to heart, but they can take a hold of me, grow to enormous proportions, even consume me.

So sometimes (often) I find myself in the position of holding a belief, but feeling that I don't have a right to assert it, or that I hold it for the wrong reasons, or that I'm a bad advertisement for it and would serve it better by keeping my mouth shut, or I'm ashamed to assert it because I feel open to some personal accusation.

Take, for instance, my love of tradition (and especially of particular traditions), which I have often written about.

I'm a traditionalist through and through. But what if my traditionalism is rooted in my own inadequacies, neuroses, weaknesses? What if it's a craving for the familiar and the predictable out of a fear of change? Do I have the right to be a traditionalist?

There are many other elements to this self-doubt, big and small. Take, for instance, the matter of children. I don't have children. This might be considered just hard luck, but one can't help blaming oneself or feeling a personal sense of failure, and I blame myself for all sorts of reasons, rational or not. (Fellow conservatives, please hesitate before pointing to a politician's childlessness as evidence of some agenda. It might be the biggest regret of their lives.) 

Well, children are the great carriers of tradition. In a book about endangered languages, a linguist put it like this: Children don't so much learn languages as recreate them. He called the process mysterious and magical. In fact, the linguist was clear that the survival of any given language is really based upon whether it is being passed on to children. And this seems true of many or most traditions, including personal ones. (And one never feels this more than at Christmas time and other holidays, especially when you look at social media.)

I know it's irrational to think "I have no right to be a traditionalist because I have no children". I wouldn't think it of anybody else. I only think it of myself.

The criticism extends to smaller things, as well. I know somebody who has extremely liberal (and anti-Catholic) beliefs, is strongly anti-Brexit etc., but who speaks Irish fluently and plays the harp. Isn't she a truer traditionalist than I am? She is keeping actual Irish traditions alive. What right do I have to criticise her? What right do I even have (this is how deep this complex of mine runs) to argue with her about any subject that touches upon traditionalism, identity, etc?

It even comes down to quite small things. It's borne upon me more and more that the kitchen is the room where a huge amount of national, regional and family traditions are kept alive. But I can't cook, except very simple things, and my knowledge of cuisine is incredibly limited. Not only that, but for years I was very dismissive of cookery books, cookery shows, and conversations about food-- something I keenly regret now.  That's a fairly small thing because I could doubtless change it easily enough. (Although my low self-esteem means I always assume everything will be much harder for me.)

Another way this self-doubt afflicts me is when it comes to my attitude to Catholic Ireland.

My nostalgia for Catholic Ireland, and the Irish Catholic tradition, deepens all the time. If I write another book, my plan is to make it a celebration of Irish Catholicism. (I love it when books have the word "celebration" in the title-- ironically, they are often cookery books.) In fact, the sense of duty I feel to the memory of Catholic Ireland becomes painful at times, when I read some article or see some old clip that cuts me to the quick with the atmosphere of Catholic Ireland-- its gentleness, solidarity, appreciation for the spiritual and cultural, etc.

But again-- what if this is mere nostalgia on my part? What if it's simply an escape from the present world, or from my own inadequacies, and so forth? I love Catholic Ireland, but do I have the right to this love, do I have the right to its expression?

Here again, there is the same pattern. If anybody were to attack Catholic Ireland because it was backward, reactionary, lacking in compassion, etc. etc., I would pay little heed to such criticisms-- I would feel confident they were either untrue or simply missing the point.

But if anyone were to criticize my motives for loving Catholic Ireland, for looking back yearningly to it, then I would feel completely devastated. In fact, I anticipate such criticisms, and if I hear them made of others I apply them to myself.

As you can guess, my self-doubt is particularly oppressive recently, but it's always there.

I'm sorry for the sombre post, after the long delay. You can imagine how reflections like these might make me hesitate to join in public discussions-- though they are often overcome by my sheer hunger for the fray. I wish you all a happy Christmas-- God bless you-- and thanks to everyone who reads this blog, and who bought my book.

17 comments:

  1. I'd just assumed that you were absent because you talking in Belfast (or somewhere) again.
    It goes without saying that there's different types of conservatism. I've noticed that classical musicians, often these specialising in the sacred, and the experts thereof, are not necessarily the most socially conservative people. But it doesn't mean that I'm unhappy with what they do and conserve.
    As I turned 45 yesterday, there's been very little prospect of me having children for some time now... my thought might not quite resonate with someone else the same way,but I'm inclined to think that there's a "pro-conservativeness" and indeed "pro-lifeness" about not having to have offspring at all cost. The irony of our anti-life society is that, while in many ways it rejects life, it also feels justified in creating life whenever it's the preferred commodity. Years ago it was accepted that some people wouldn't have family, often for example, one family member sacrificed themselves to cater for ageing parents and were getting older when these died. It was considered good and proper. Nobody created life for self-fulfillment. I can't wondering whether the change in the culture of laity has encouraged in some ways to the Church's vocation decline. If having descendants is more important than all moral norms why should any, woman in particular, dedicate herself to a life where one can't have something seen largely as a personal physical and psychological fulfillment? Yes, people like us would be open to life for the right reasons, but we can,and I do, feel an inner peace of heart, knowing that it isn't always the goal of the human person, even if it is through necessity ,for humanity's sake, central to a majority of lives.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Happy birthday!

      Yes, those are all good points. I certainly wish there was less emphasis on having children as some barometer of conservatism. For instance, Traditionalists might stop the endless harping on "young families" at the Latin Mass (a claim I've found to be exaggerated anyway).

      In this post I am admitting to thoughts which I realize are irrational but I find very difficult, perhaps even impossible, to overcome.

      Delete
    2. By the way, I notice you have a birthday that no practicing Catholic has any excuse to forget...the Feast of the Immaculate Conception!

      Delete
    3. Well,I guess a lot of Latin Mass families try to be counter-cultural by promoting larger families. And good on them, as far as that goes.
      After writing the above comment,a friend mentioned to me the irony of same-sex couples making the 'creation' of embryos, often making a fairly public announcement about it, while thousands of stored embryos coming from heterosexual couples get destroyed altogether. In a slightly less crazy world extant embryos would at very least be saved. A mutual friend of ours has a brother whose two children are shared among four parents;I was a bit surprised to hear that the "female couple" keep a relationship of sorts with our friend's mother as the grandmother-of-the-sperm-donor-of-one-of-the-boys.
      It's not necessarily parents that are the ones who are keeping the pro-life culture.

      Delete
  2. Maolsheachlann thanks for writing that very personal post. It can't have been easy. I missed your presence and remembered you in my prayers in case you were going through a bad patch.

    The possible connection you mention between traditionalism and personal feelings of inadequacy could be equally applied to the vast majority of liberals. Want to blend in , be part of the majority , not to have think things out for yourself??? Conservative people by and large are stronger and more resilient than those who only have to drift along with a mindless consensus. We have flaws but unlike liberals we are usually aware of them.

    You do great good on line. You generally shine a light of truth rather than simply lament the cold darkness in your writing. That is a great gift. I think work like this site is like the biblical mustard seed. Seems tiny and pointless but we have no idea what it may inspire.

    We do live in times where it is easy to despair and flag.Humanly things are dire but we believe we are not on our own. Pray for courage and a serene heart. May the Lord bless the work.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for those very kind words, Cato-- I very much appreciate them. Sorry it took a while to publish your comment.

      I think you make a very good point-- the existence of this double standard, whereby anyone who is a conservative or a traditionalist or right-wing is angry, frustrated, lacking in some way, and expressing their internal anger-- while it's OK to be angry if you are on the left, and in that case it's righteous anger at social ills. I remember one vlogger pointed out that, when he was depressed and unemployed and left-wing, he fell into the category of oppressed victim in the eyes of the left. But as soon as he became depressed and unemployed and right-wing, his situation became a reason to attack him and undermine his views.

      Having said that, I do actually think that ALL factions go in for these kind of cheap shots, though it's much more prevalent on the left. To take an example not relevant to my case, since I am not a socialist: if you are on the dole queue, or in poorly paid employment, and you are a socialist, you are liable to be mocked for not being able to make any money but wanting to spend other peoples'. But if you are wealthy and a socialist, you are called a champagne socialist. It hardly seems consistent.

      Surely it seems better just to address peoples' beliefs and not go into their motives or personal situation. I try to avoid this myself. In fact, on the Irish Conservatives Forum, the only two rules I set were: be polite, and don't question anybody's motives.

      All the same, I am so sensitive to such imputations, that I have sometimes felt like not giving ANY opinions in public whatsoever.

      Thanks for the prayers, I deeply appreciate them.

      Delete
  3. Great to catch up on this treasure of a blog once again. Reflecting to the particular problem in the post I would heartily recommend a most helpful book by an American named Trent Beattie (presumably a layman) published by Loreto ("The Douay-Rheims people") some years back. His take on scruples is made from personal experience and a very good read (imo). The title of the book is "Scruples and Sainthood. Accepting and Overcoming Scruples With the Help of the Saints" and it has the crown of thorns as cover picture. That mystery of the Rosary can also be chosen for an additional decade now and then!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, Thomae. If I come across it, I will have a look at it. Am I suffering from scrupulosity? Maybe. I hadn't really thought of it like that!

      Delete
    2. Whether you suffer from it not may be open to doubt (no pun intended!) but the book tackles the "problem" head on in describing some examples and treats, and is well worth reading also from the objective side. There is a certain focus on scruples in relation to receiving holy communion and even if you have not suffered from scruples in that respect it says a lot about how it can be for others. It´s been a while since I read it but it was a book that I intend to go back to, and for more than 95 percent of read books I never do that so it had something solid!

      Delete
  4. Fear freezes. 365 times in the Bible people are told in various ways and at various times "Fear not, I am with you always."
    Trust is the cure for fear. God is our loving Father, He cares for each one of us as if we were His only child.

    http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?m=1101545887070&ca=02655dca-4b4c-4765-94fa-cbe937de0d85

    ReplyDelete
  5. Why do so many supposedly “Catholic” writers have comment moderation? What are these “Catholics” afraid of. If people want to show what they are like then let them do so.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Because hate-filled rad trads and similar types have nothing constructive to add. Now go away.

      Delete
  6. Hate filled? I suppose that includes Saints Peter and Paul and all their successors who told us to hold fast to the traditions. The only Church of God the Holy Father was established by his Son in 33 A.D. not 1965. Even the Prod “churches” are older than the John Paul sect.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Every heretic and schismatic in history accused the Church of departing from orthodoxy. High church Protestants (i.e., rad trads) are no different.

      Delete
  7. Here is some news for you young lad. If you don’t know heresy when it stares you in the face then you are not a Catholic. And of course you are not properly baptized which is why you do not have the Catholic faith.
    Learn the faith and then get a conditional Baptism by someone you can trust.
    Otherwise, be ready to explain to God the All Holy Father how the seven sacraments of Giovanni Montini are better than the seven sacraments of his Son.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Arius, Calvin, Luther and all the heretics in history also thought the Catholic Church was blatantly apostate. How do you like finding yourself in that company?

    ReplyDelete