Monday, July 28, 2025

The Brittas Empire

British TV sitcoms have been a part of my life for as long as I can remember. I grew up watching them. I assumed that everybody else did, too, and it's only in recent years that I've realized this isn't true. I've frequently asked people (in Ireland, naturally) for their favourite British sit-coms and I'm always taken aback when somebody says: "I never really watched any."

There were always British sit-coms on the television in my home, growing up. My father was an Irish republican who had an anglophobic side, at least in theory. But he'd often say: "The British do comic characters better than anybody." Sometimes he'd preface this with: "It pains me to admit it..." (And yet, he read Samuel Pepys and John Le Carré, watched English soccer and cricket and every other English sport, and was hooked on British politics. As a bigot, he was an abject failure.)

Yes, the British do comic characters better than anybody, although I can't really comment on the comic creations of Iceland, Indonesia, or Fiji. But you know what I mean.

And this long predates television, of course. Since I read it in my teens, I've believed that Diary of a Nobody by the Grossmiths (1892) is the funniest book ever written. But then there's Bertie Wooster and Adrian Mole and any number of other literary gems.

Still, you can't beat a good old British sit-com on the good old telly, with a good old cuppa.

Here are some of the British sit-coms I love (and a few I don't), broken down into different tiers. It's not at all comprehensive (or perhaps I should say "comp"):

The Top Tier: Fawlty Towers (best of the best), The Fall and Rise of Reginald Perrin, The Office (UK, obviously), Only Fools and Horses.

The Second Tier: Porridge, Rising Damp, Blackadder, Father Ted, The IT Crowd, Whatever Happened to the Likely Lads?, Sorry!, Steptoe and Son.

The Third Tier: Men Behaving Badly, Yes Minister, Keeping Up Appearances, Ever-Decreasing Circles, Bottom, I'm Alan Partridge, Red Dwarf, Yes Prime Minister, Only When I Laugh, 'Allo 'Allo, Bless Me Father, Bless This House, On The Buses, Love Thy Neighbour, Shelley, You Rang, M'Lord?

The Fourth Tier (stuff that I either don't find funny at all, or just so repulsive that I might occasionally laugh but still hate it); Last of the Summer Wine, The Young Ones, The Vicar of Dibley, Bottom, Rab C. Nesbitt, Dad's Army.

As eagle-eyed readers will have gathered from the title of the blog post, I'm going to be writing about The Brittas Empire here. The central character of this one is Gordon Brittas, the obnoxious but idealistic manager of a sports and leisure centre. It ran from 1991 to 1997.

I've been watching The Brittas Empire recently, and I think I'd place it in the second tier.

The funny thing is, I can remember when The Brittas Empire was originally broadcast, and I didn't like it at all. I half-watched it when my father was watching it, but I was never won over. I bracketed it with its close contemporary Keeping Up Appearances; a painfully formulaic show that won a certain amount of laughs from the fact that it was so audaciously formulaic.

Watching it again, I've completely changed my mind. The Brittas Empire is significantly different from any other sit-com I know. For the following reasons (none of them are unique in themselves, but the combination is unique):

1) The large cast. It's very much an ensemble piece with lots of regulars, despite the focus on the central character.

2) The frequently brutal nature of the comedy. It can't really be described as dark, because it's not realistic or serious enough to be dark. Nor can it be called unsentimental, because it has some quite sentimental moments (and I'm fine with that.)

No; brutal is the best term I can think of. Characters frequently die violently in The Brittas Empire. There's a general atmosphere of menace and extremity. One of the best lines comes when we're told that Gordon Brittas worked for the Samaritans for one day. In that one day, four callers committed suicide, and one of them had only called because of a wrong number. (It shouldn't be funny, but it is.) 

In another scene, Brittas's long-suffering wife is sitting by his hospital bed, as he lies unconscious, and is moved when one of his colleagues gives a speech on Brittas's complete lack of malice and his sincere desire to make the world a better place. She's is so moved that she plugs his life-support system back in.

Then there is the receptionist who is keeping her baby in a drawer at reception, and seems to be in a perpetual sense of nervous breakdown.

But the brutality isn't constant. That would get tiresome and too depressing. It's intermittent, and clubs you over the head at just the right moments. And the smattering of invincibly cheerful and oblivious characters (including Brittas himself) lifts the mood sufficiently.

3) The surreal elements. Sometimes the surrealism comes from highly improbable occurrences (like deadly and exotic spiders being sent to Brittas through the post), but sometimes it goes beyond improbable-- like the episode where a long line of people holding hands are simultaneously electrocuted, in a very cartoonish manner.

What makes the surrealism especially effective is that it's in contrast to the underlying atmosphere of the series. It's not a comedy like Father Ted or Blackadder, where the entire world in which the characters exist is zany. In The Brittas Empire, the bizarre is constantly breaking through a mostly very ordinary, very English existence.

4) The intensity of the farce. The Brittas Empire is like Fawlty Towers in that it generally involves a series of mishaps that come together, in unexpected ways, and form a disaster that is much greater than the sum of its parts. It's not as ingenious or brilliant at doing this as Fawlty Towers (nothing is), but it's much more extreme. The disaster often involves explosions, fires, deaths, and so forth. The best comparison is probably the comic fiction of Tom Sharpe.

To sum up, I'm surprised at how much I've had to revise my previous impression.

(One little additional thing: watching it this time round, I've wondered if the character of Carol, the permanently stressed receptonist, might have had any influence on Renée Zellwegger's portrayal of Bridget Jones. The resemblance is very striking. But it might just be coincidence. I'd link to a reel of Carol moments, but I can't find any.)

7 comments:

  1. I remember the Samaritan joke, but I could swear I heard it on Red Dwarf in reference to Rimmer.

    One of these days, I'm going to have to set my teeth and resume watching The Office from episode two. Ricky Gervais is so good at what he does, he makes me squirm.

    My favorite scene in Reginald Perrin is where Geoffrey Palmer and Leonard Rossiter trade off litanies of unsavory left-wing and right-wing types and Palmer finishes with "That's good, I thought support would be difficult."

    Doc Martin doesn't make your list. Too serious to be considered a sitcom?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You did hear the Samaritan joke on Red Dwarf! Funnily enough, I haven't heard it on either, but I've been reading about the Brittas Empire on TV Tropes, possibly my favourite website, and it's mentioned that they recycled it there.

      I can understand Ricky Gervais making you squirm, but he puts his own character through such a wringer in The Office that you end up feeling sorry for him and rooting for him.

      Yes, the "forces of anarchy" is one of the great set-pieces of Reggie Perrin-- I'd even say of British TV comedy! In fact, it led to a spin-off starring Geoffrey Palmer called Fairly Secret Army around the same time. He was basically the same character even though they couldn't use the name. It's on YouTube, I watched it all-- it's fairly good.

      I haven't seen a whole lot of Doc Martin, but yes, I'd consider it a "dramedy" rather than a sit-com myself.

      Thanks for your comment!

      Delete
  2. I find that I broadly agree with your opinion in general and choices in particular (with, of course, exceptions, as inevitable).

    I have found that many have diminished in enjoyability with rewatching - but that is the nature of comedy, and indeed of theatre generally. So much depends on a quality of "freshness" that is lost after first time - and the anticipation and uncertainty as a series unfolds.

    Plus, I can't or don't laugh nowadays in the way I did in my mid-teens - when I would become helpless, and indeed I got into trouble often at school (many detentions) simply because I could not stop laughing - and usually at things that seemed trivial to others. The day our family watched Fawlty Towers first episode (the one about "Lord" Melbury and the "gold brick") I was made absolutely helpless at one point, and for several minutes.

    (The quality of FT was not immediately evident to most people at the time, although to was to me - and when I went to school the next day I couldn't find anyone to discuss the program with.)

    One that stands up to multiple rewatching, and in the first tier for me, is Whatever Happened to the Likely Lads, but then the location and themes have a special relevance to me and my family - beyond the humour.

    I haven't found myself upgrading on rewatching, as happened for you with Brittas - and I never liked Brittas first time round. But I may give it another try - certainly the lead actor is a great comedian (he was in Red Dwarf, anyway - but find I can't rewatch that nowadays!)

    I've often said, as a generalization, that comedy is a young man's game (I did comic writing for performance, and publication, throughout my late teens and twenties, but it faded away in my thirties) - and to some extent I find that applies to appreciation of comedy too. Or, at least, I find I need more than laughs - some other depths.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My favourite comedy is always comedy that has depths, too-- in fact, I would say that might be the ONE flaw of Fawlty Towers, that it's pretty much all on the surface and you never really get to care about the characters. On the other hand, that seems so essential to the show that perhaps it's not a flaw after all. I'm a big fan of the Adrian Mole books by Sue Townsend because they do have a lot of heart. And, of course, my beloved G.K. Chesterton is very funny but far more than funny, as C.S. Lewis said: "His humor was of the kind which I like best- not "jokes" imbedded in the page like currants in a cake, still less (what I cannot endure), a general tone of flippancy and jocularity, but the humor which is not in any way separable from the argument but is rather (as Aristotle would say) the "bloom" on dialectic itself. The sword glitters not because the swordsman set out to make it glitter but because he is fighting for his life and therefore moving it very quickly."

      Fawlty Towers got bad reviews at first. It's hard to believe now, but it did. There are few episodes that are not so good but the classics (Lord Melbury, the Hotel Inspectors, the Kipper and the Corpse, and most of all Waldorf Salad) are just deathless, in my view.

      Whatever Happened to the Likely Lads? is a show that has really grown on me and I think it does have that other depth you're talking about, at least in part. One of the best books I've read recently was State of Emergency, a cultural history of Britain the early seventies by Dominic Sandbrook. It draws on Whatever Happened to the Likely Lads? extensively, which shows that this show really had its finger on the pulse (to use a horrible cliché).

      Thanks for your comment!

      Delete
    2. Oh, and I forgot to mention my favourite line from Whatever Happened to the Likely Lads?, from the episode where Bob has come out of the army and Terry is showing him all the changes in the town, including a demolished rock club: "The Go-Go? Gone?"

      Someone has written a blog post quoting it, I just discovered:

      https://ayearinthecountry.co.uk/the-likely-lads-time-capsule-snapshots-of-faded-history/

      Delete
  3. And Newcastle's Club a'Gogo was a real place - making the joke even deeper!

    https://readysteadygone.co.uk/club-agogo-newcastle-2/

    ReplyDelete